PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH DI WILAYAH PERTAMBANGAN POMALAA

Authors

  • Muh. Razya Aprizky Universitas Sembilanbelas November Author
  • Marwan Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka Author
  • Muflih Faiz Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka Author
  • Arief Rahman Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka Author
  • Saenal Universitas Sembilanbelas November Kolaka Author

Keywords:

Land Dispute Resolution, Mining Business Permit (IUP), Compensation Mechanism, Mediation, Mining Conflict

Abstract

Background: This study aims to analyze the resolution of land disputes between landowners and companies holding Mining Business Permits (IUP) and to examine appropriate compensation mechanisms. The research method used is normative juridical with a literature study approach in the Pomala area of Kolaka Regency, Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. However, in some cases, if mediation fails, the settlement continues to the realm of litigation. This study concludes that the active role of the Regional Government and company transparency are key to resolving mining disputes. Methods: This research is a legal research using normative juridical methods. The approaches used are the statutory approach and the case approach. The data used are sourced from secondary data, including primary legal materials in the form of laws and regulations (the Mining Law and the Basic Agrarian Law) and secondary legal materials in the form of scientific journal articles, official news reports, and previous research results relevant to land disputes in the Pomalaa mining area. The data collection technique was carried out through documentary studies by reviewing literature related to the dynamics of agrarian conflicts between local communities and nickel mining companies in Kolaka. The collected data were analyzed descriptively and analytically to map the root of the problem and available legal resolution efforts. Results: The research results indicate that the dispute arose from differences of opinion regarding the price of land acquisition and the unclear status of compensation for crops on the land. Dispute resolution was prioritized through a consensus approach (mediation) facilitated by the local government to reach an agreement on compensation. However, if mediation failed, the settlement proceeded to litigation. Conclusions: This study concludes that the active role of local governments and company transparency are key to resolving mining disputes. Therefore, collaboration between governments, companies, and communities is necessary to create fair resolutions and provide legal certainty for all parties involved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Republik Indonesia. (1960). Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.

Republik Indonesia. (1967). Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 1967 tentang Ketentuan-Ketentuan Dasar Pertambangan.

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.

Republik Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 2010 tentang Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Usaha Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.

Republik Indonesia. (2012). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah bagi Pembangunan untuk Kepentingan Umum.

Republik Indonesia. (2020). Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.

B. Buku

Harsono, B. (2008). Hukum Agraria Indonesia: Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Djambatan.

Limbong, B. (2012). Konflik Agraria. Margaretha Pustaka.

C. Jurnal & Artikel Ilmiah

Afrizal, & Berenschot, W. (2022). Land-use change conflicts and anti-corporate activism in Indonesia: A review essay. Journal of East Asian Studies, 22(2), 333–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2022.14

Eso, R., Jaya, A., Taridala, S. A. A., & Randalembah, A. (2024). Penggunaan proksi kerentanan magnetik tanah untuk memperkirakan ketebalan lapisan penutup di atas bijih tanah laterit di Pulau Sulawesi, Indonesia. Iraqi Geological Journal, 57(1C), 112–125.

Hamzah, Y. A. (2017). Hubungan hukum antara pemegang izin usaha pertambangan dengan pemegang hak atas tanah di atasnya. Al Hikam, 1(1), 115–123.

Ihyamuis, M., Patittingi, F., & Lahae, K. (2022). Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa pertambangan: Studi sengketa tanah antara masyarakat Karunsi’e Dongi dan PT Vale Indonesia Tbk. Amanna Gappa, 1–14.

Nakamnanu, M. D. (2025). Penerapan asas keadilan dalam proses penyelesaian hak atas tanah untuk kegiatan pertambangan. Justitia et Pax, 41(1), 1–18.

Nugroho, L., & Masyunah, M. (2025). Keunggulan penyelesaian sengketa alternatif dibandingkan dengan litigasi di pengadilan. AHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 13(1), 45–62.

Achmad, W. (2024). Konflik sengketa lahan dan strategi penyelesaian di Indonesia. Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik, 6(1), 8–18.

Fahmi, R., Wahyuningsih, S. E., & Kusriyah, S. (2023). Legal reconstruction of land dispute regulation in Indonesia based on Pancasila justice. Scholar International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 6(2), 134–140.

Hadju, N. N. (2025). Penegakan hukum lingkungan dalam pengelolaan pertambangan. Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 5(1), 1–12.

Jumra, Tarmizi, Rasyid, M., & Suriyati. (2024). The role of mediation in land dispute resolution: Effectiveness and challenges. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 4(2), 89–93. https://doi.org/10.59065/jissr.v4i2.157

Suartini, S., Hidayati, M. N., & Maryam, A. (2024). Pendekatan restorative justice dalam penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan di Indonesia. Binamulia Hukum, 12(2), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.37893/jbh.v12i2.621

Widodo, P., Uksan, A., & Sukendro, A. (2023). Peace sustainability in mining conflict resolution in Southeast Sulawesi in realizing national security. International Journal of Social Science, 2(5), 2303–2310. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i5.5212

Yanto, & Attamimi, Z. F. (2025). Efektivitas mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa tanah di Kantor Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kabupaten Banyumas. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 8(2), 210–225.

D. Situs Web / Berita Online

Bidik Hukum News. (2025, Januari 10). Demonstrasi warga dusun 2 Lawania tolak perampasan tanah: Kehadiran PT Indonesia Pomalaa Industry Park dan PT Rimau timbulkan konflik sosial di Kolaka. https://www.bidikhukumnews.com/demonstrasi-warga-dusun-2-lawania-tolak-perampasan-tanah-kehadiran-pt-indonesia-pomalaa-industry-park-dan-pt-rimau-timbulkan-konflik-social-di-kolaka/

Mongabay Indonesia. (2024, Februari 15). Perusahaan tambang nikel di Sulawesi Tenggara kriminalisasi warga penolak tambang. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2024/02/15/perusahaan-tambang-nikel-di-sulawesi-tenggara-kriminalisasi-warga-penolak-tambang/

Camat Pomalaa. (2025). Camat Pomalaa sambut baik sosialisasi tim rayon Lambuato terkait sengketa lahan. Trias Politika. https://triaspolitika.id/camat-pomalaa-sambut-baik-sosialisasi-tim-rayon-lambuato-terkait-sengketa-lahan/

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Aprizky, M. R., Marwan, Muflih Faiz, Arief Rahman, & Saenal. (2026). PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH DI WILAYAH PERTAMBANGAN POMALAA. Batanghari Academia Journal, 1(2), 91-101. https://journal.batanghariacademia.com/index.php/baj/article/view/53